Anthony M. Zupcic

Representative Matters

• Gilead v. Idenix in interference No. 105,871 involving novel nucleoids useful for treating HCV and interference no. 105,981 involving method of treating HCV with a nucleoside compound.
• IBM against Rambus in interference Nos. 105,467 and 105,911 involving memory systems.
• Amgen against Human Genome Sciences in Interference No. 105,613 involving a key receptor in the immune system.
• INA against Delphi in Interference No. 105,468 involving automobile valve lifters.
• Medtronic Navigation, Inc. against GE Medical Systems Global Technology in Interference No. 105,415 involving surgical navigation technology.
• Helmholtz-Zentrum Fur Infektionsforschung Gmb, exclusive licensor to Bristol-Myers Squibb, against Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research in Interference No. 105,298 involving epothilone C and epothilone D.
• Bristol-Myers Squibb against Tolerance Therapeutics, LLC in Interference Nos. 105,105; 105,106; and 105,107 involving fusion proteins.
• Matsushita v. Sakaguchi in Interference No. 105,263 relating to semiconductors.
• Stiller v. Heid in Interference No. 105,044 involving a specimen transport mechanism.
• West v. Van Damme in Interference No. 105,031 involving photosensitive printing plates.
• Shinomiya v. Hanya in Interference No. 104,097 involving liquid crystal displays.
• Riseman v. Kobayashi in Interference No. 103,780 relating to laser beam printer technology.
• Kaneko v. Sakaegi in Interference No. 103,000 involving camera white balance.
• Hoshino v. Tanaka in Interference No. 103,208 relating to autofocus.
• Katayama v. Levien in Interference No. 103,587 involving halftone imaging.
• Canon Inc. against various parties in Interference Nos. 102,090; 102,091, 102,092; 102,323; 103,212; 103,187; and 103,213, all relating to liquid crystal display technology.
• Shibuzaki v. Furuichi in Interference No. 101,822 relating to copy magnification in an electrophotographic copying machine.
• Lawrence v. Suzuki in Interference No. 101,692 relating to sheet sorters.
• Ito v. Masuda in Interference No. 101,278 relating to a scanning mechanism in an electrophotographic copying machine.

Representative Clients

• Canon
• Gilead
• IBM
• Forward Pharma
• Amgen

Education

• J.D. Georgetown University Law Center 1974
• B.S. Aerospace Engineering cum laude University of Notre Dame 1970

Bar Admissions

• New York
• U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Court Admissions

• U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
• U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
• U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
• U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

• Recognized as a Leading IP Practitioner in the World, WIPR 2017
• IP Star, Managing Intellectual Property, 2013-2017
• IAM Patent 1000, 2012-2017
• Leaders League for New York: Patent Prosecution, 2014
• Who’s Who of Patent Lawyers, 2011 
• Patent Buddy as one of the Top Patent Prosecutors nationally in the Computer, Electrical, Software and Business Methods, 2011
• Legal 500 for Patent prosecution: utility and design patents, 2008-2017
• Legal 500 for Patent litigation: full coverage, 2008, 2016
• Legal 500 for IP-Non-Contentious/Transactional – patent prosecution, 2007
• Super Lawyers: New York Metro Edition, 2015-2018