Anthony M. Zupcic

Representative Matters

• Represented a client in Gilead v. Idenix in interference No. 105,871, involving novel nucleoids useful for treating HCV, and interference no. 105,981, involving a method of treating HCV with a nucleoside compound 
• Represented IBM against Rambus in interference Nos. 105,467 and 105,911, involving memory systems 
• Represented Amgen against Human Genome Sciences in Interference No. 105,613, involving a key receptor in the immune system 
• Represented INA against Delphi in Interference No. 105,468, involving automobile valve lifters 
• Represented Medtronic Navigation, Inc. against GE Medical Systems Global Technology in Interference No. 105,415, involving surgical navigation technology 
• Represented Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung Gmb, exclusive licensor to Bristol-Myers Squibb, against Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research in Interference No. 105,298, involving epothilone C and epothilone D 
• Represented Bristol-Myers Squibb against Tolerance Therapeutics, LLC in Interference Nos. 105,105; 105,106; and 105,107, involving fusion proteins 
• Represented a client in Matsushita v. Sakaguchi in Interference No. 105,263, related to semiconductors 
• Represented a client in Stiller v. Heid in Interference No. 105,044, involving a specimen transport mechanism 
• Represented a client in West v. Van Damme in Interference No. 105,031, involving photosensitive printing plates 
• Represented a client in Shinomiya v. Hanya in Interference No. 104,097, involving liquid crystal displays 
• Represented a client in Riseman v. Kobayashi in Interference No. 103,780, related to laser beam printer technology 
• Represented a client in Kaneko v. Sakaegi in Interference No. 103,000, involving camera white balance 
• Represented a client in Hoshino v. Tanaka in Interference No. 103,208, related to autofocus 
• Represented a client in Katayama v. Levien in Interference No. 103,587, involving halftone imaging 
• Represented Canon Inc. against various parties in Interference Nos. 102,090; 102,091, 102,092; 102,323; 103,212; 103,187; and 103,213, all related to liquid crystal display technology 
• Represented a client in Shibuzaki v. Furuichi in Interference No. 101,822, related to copy magnification in an electrophotographic copying machine 
• Represented a client in Lawrence v. Suzuki in Interference No. 101,692, related to sheet sorters 
• Represented a client in Ito v. Masuda in Interference No. 101,278, related to a scanning mechanism in an electrophotographic copying machine

Representative Clients

• Canon
• Gilead
• IBM
• Forward Pharma
• Amgen

Education

• J.D. Georgetown University Law Center 1974
• B.S. Aerospace Engineering cum laude University of Notre Dame 1970

Bar Admissions

• New York
• U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Court Admissions

• U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
• U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
• U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
• U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

• Recognized as a "Leading IP Practitioner in the World", WIPR 2017
• Included in Super Lawyers: New York Metro Edition, 2015 - 2020
• Included in Leaders League for New York: Patent Prosecution, 2014
• Listed in IP Star, Managing Intellectual Property, 2013 - 2017 
• Included in IAM Patent 1000, 2012 - 2017
• Listed in Who’s Who of Patent Lawyers, 2011 
• Included in Patent Buddy as one of the “Top Patent Prosecutors,” nationally, in Computer, Electrical, Software and Business Methods, 2011
• Recognized in Legal 500 for Patent prosecution: utility and design patents, 2008 - 2017
• Recognized in Legal 500 for Patent litigation: full coverage, 2008, 2016
• Recognized in Legal 500 for IP-Non-Contentious/Transactional – patent prosecution, 2007