Bar Admissions

  • District of Columbia
  • Florida
  • Maryland
  • New York
  • Virginia
  • Washington

Court Admissions

  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Federal Claims
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia
  • U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Education

  • J.D., cum laude, George Washington University Law School, 1987
  • B.A., magna cum laude, Florida State University, 1984
    Phi Beta Kappa

    Union Board Recipient for Outstanding Leader
T +1 202.344.4703
F +1 202.344.8300
 

J. Douglas Baldridge

Partner

For three decades, Mr. Baldridge has litigated disputes concerning antitrust, intellectual property, false advertising (both private and FTC regulatory matters), unfair competition, First Amendment and publishers' rights, franchise agreements, toxic torts, securities, commercial lending, commercial real estate and general business issues. A first chair trial lawyer, he has tried to verdict numerous complex matters. Most recently he secured a victory for a generic drug maker in the first test of what limits may be placed on reverse payment antitrust deals in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in FTC v. Actavis. (In Re: Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation).

Mr. Baldridge has been recognized by a number of publications, including the National Law Journal, Law360, and Global Competition Review, as an "elite" trial lawyer and competition law "MVP" and is a "Recognized Practitioner" in the General Commercial area of the 2014 and 2015 editions of Chambers USA.

Mr. Baldridge is Chair of Venable's Washington Litigation Group encompassing the Washington, DC, Virginia and Rockville, Maryland offices. He also serves as General Counsel of duPont Publishing which distributes magazines under the duPont Registry brand in the United States and 54 countries.

Significant Matters

Mr. Baldridge's recent litigation experience:

Antitrust, False Advertising and Unfair Competition:
  • Defense as lead trial counsel for generic Hatch-Waxman "first-filer" against multi-billion dollar class action (MDL) antitrust "reverse payments" claims. Client obtained a unanimous defense jury verdict after a seven week trial in the first "reverse payments" antitrust trial after the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in FTC v. Actavis (In Re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation); 
  • Defense as lead trial counsel of a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer against claims under the Sherman Act arising from an "Actavis"-type settlement of patent litigation (In Re Modafinil Antitrust Litigation);
  • Defense of a Fortune 10 consumer products company against claims under the Sherman Act, culminating in a three month jury trial involving retail marketing, category management, rebates, and exclusive dealing;
  • Defense of a Fortune 20 beverage manufacturer against claims under Sherman Act and RICO arising from termination of a dealership, culminating in a five month jury trial;
  • Defense of vitamin supplement company against Federal Trade Commission false advertising and contempt proceedings (FTC v. Garden of Life);
  • Representation of major financial services company in FTC investigation and related claims arising from alleged data security breach;
  • Representation of major financial services company in FTC investigation and related claims alleging ‘aiding and facilitating’ liability under the FTC Act resulting in closure of FTC investigation;
  • Defense of submersible turbine petroleum pump manufacturers against Department of Justice Clayton Act Section 7 merger challenge. He contributed to "the fix," which involves the licensing of critical patents or technologies by the merged entity to market competitors resulting in positive competitive impact (United States v. Franklin Electric Company);
  • Defense of a coal producer merger candidate against a Federal Trade Commission Clayton Act Section 7 merger challenge, defeating the FTC resulting in consummation of the merger (Arch Coal, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission);
  • Defense of a consumer products company in six class actions involving false advertising and unfair competition.

Publishers' Rights & First Amendment:
  • Prosecution of rights of publicity and privacy claims on behalf of an internationally recognized professional athlete (Eldrick Tiger Woods, Elin Nordegren Woods, & Privacy, Ltd. v. Christensen Shipyards, Ltd. & Carol Williamson & Associates);
  • Prosecution of libel claims in the Irish High Court on behalf of an international celebrity (Elin Nordegren Woods v. Dubliner Media, Ltd.).

Intellectual Property:
  • Defense of trademark infringement and dilution claims on behalf of internationally recognized singer-songwriter, musician and actress (Blue Sphere v. Taylor Swift); 
  • Defense of patent infringement claims involving a method patent for compressing and downloading audio and visual data (Global Patent Holdings LLC v. The Boca Raton Resort & Club);
  • Defense of Mobil Oil in patent infringement case involving numerous chemical patents claiming metallocene catalysts for fabrication of plastics;
  • Defense of Tenneco in patent infringement case involving mechanical patent claiming latching mechanism for plastic containers;
  • Defense of an international publisher against claims for trademark infringement, false advertising, and unfair competition (Modell v. duPont Publishing, Inc.);
  • Defense of an international publisher against claims under the Copyright Act involving rights to artwork used on magazine covers (duPont International v. Lajos).

Real Estate and Commercial:
  • Representation of the District of Columbia in all litigation relating to the acquisition of land for the Washington Nationals Major League Baseball stadium (i.e. District of Columbia v. 521,025 Square Feet of Land In the District of Columbia);
  • Representation of a pension fund in the liquidation of a $500,000,000 commercial real estate portfolio, involving all aspects of liquidation and complex business and bankruptcy issues (Potomac Equity Portfolio L.P.).

Shareholder Disputes and Securities:
  • Representation of plaintiff-shareholders in energy cogeneration company in multiple arbitrations and court proceedings arising from diversion of company assets, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract (In Re Powersmith);
  • Representation of plaintiff-shareholder in start-up energy conversion company in securities fraud litigation under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act (Frank Carlucci v. Envion);
  • Defense of member of Board of Directors against CLASS ACTION claims under Section 11 of the Securities Exchange Act (In Re Wilmington Trust Securities Litigation);
  • Representation of defendant-shareholders and board of directors in Voice-Over-Internet communications company in action arising from diversion of corporate opportunities, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty.

Pro Bono:
  • Prosecution of claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, forcing the purchase and implementation of ADA-accessible voting technology resulting in a multi-week trial and landmark ADA decision (American Assoc. of People With Disabilities v. Duval County Florida Supervisor of Elections).