The fate of patent laches – a remedy for prejudice caused by undue delay – was hotly debated at the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v First Quality Baby Products, LLC, in light of the Supreme Court of the US’ (SCOTUS) 2014 Petrella v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer decision curtailing copyright laches. On November 1, 2016, SCOTUS heard oral argument on that issue in SCA, which has significant potential to impact industry.
11/02/2016 | Intellectual Property Magazine
Should the US Supreme Court retain patent laches?
1 min
Related Services
Related Insights
SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products: Supreme Court holds that laches cannot preclude a claim for damages incurred within the Patent Act’s six-year limitations period
SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products: Supreme Court holds that laches cannot preclude a claim for damages incurred within the Patent Act’s six-year limitations period
03/22/2017
4min
Hashtagging with caution, the equitable defense of laches, and more in this issue of IP Buzz
Hashtagging with caution, the equitable defense of laches, and more in this issue of IP Buzz
January 2017
3min
Federal Circuit Clarifies Willful Infringement Is An Issue To Be Decided By Jury
Federal Circuit Clarifies Willful Infringement Is An Issue To Be Decided By Jury
1/16/2018
5min
Recent News
Venable to Sponsor Driving Diversity in Law & Leadership Series in San Francisco
Venable to Sponsor Driving Diversity in Law & Leadership Series in San Francisco
October 12, 2022
1min
WTR Recognizes Andrew Price Among Its Global Leaders for Fourth Year in a Row
WTR Recognizes Andrew Price Among Its Global Leaders for Fourth Year in a Row
September 27, 2022
2min
Venable Attorneys and Practices Recognized in 2022 Edition of LMG Life Sciences
Venable Attorneys and Practices Recognized in 2022 Edition of LMG Life Sciences
September 22, 2022
3min