Dan Blynn focuses his practice on false advertising and telemarketing litigation, and complex consumer class actions in federal and state courts. Dan assists clients with advertising substantiation investigations, and inquiries from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and state attorneys general. He also counsels clients on a variety of advertising and telemarketing-related matters. Dan’s clients include trade associations, Fortune 100 companies, dietary supplement companies, marijuana companies, energy companies, home security companies, staffing services companies, and many other large and small businesses.
He regularly represents clients in false advertising and regulatory litigation brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), Federal Trade Commission Act, Lanham Act, Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), and state consumer protection laws. He also defends against putative consumer class actions seeking certification of nationwide and statewide classes. Dan also represents clients in competitor challenges before the Better Business Bureau’s National Advertising Division (NAD) self-regulatory body. He has significant experience with electronic discovery and has successfully argued in favor of substantial narrowing of civil discovery and investigative demands from regulators.
Dan provides ongoing counsel regarding a variety of related issues, including: